DNN Hosting Register Login
 
Latest Discussions Minimize
Screen Shot Not Available by jerops
Hi,I have 2.4.3 UVG running on a 490 portal and when I use an apple with Final C...
Windows 2008 Server/Vista x64 by joshuahsu
I'm considering running DNN/UVG on Windows 2008 Server x64 with an Intel Qual pr...
Using DNN search by drabbas
I am unable to find my pictures using the DNN search feature. http://www.bradfor...
How to upgrade UVG by js360160
I have UVG 02.00.00 installed and I just downloaded UVG 02.04.04.Is there a spec...
File Transfer to Amazon by OurLink
I am having a small issue with the Amazon S3 integration on UMG. I have followed...
How to specify the format of [CREATEDATE] by loon08
like datetime.ToString("MMM,d yyyy") in .net, how to specify [CREATEDATE]'s form...
photoid in 3DCarousel not working by loon08
I am using 3DCarousel. When photoid is specified in url, it does not show the i...
A "must-have" option in "Settings / Default Sorting / Order": RANDOM by kossut
Hello, I've just purchased UMG and I can't believe, that in as rich, functional ...
Link: text box purpose by bhoffort
What is the purpose of the Link: text box in the photo property interface?Is the...
Format to export in final cut by rmalone
Weve got an issue exporting from final cut, I dont know what has happened, but w...
Our Partnership Minimize
If you are looking for good DNN hosting, then PowerDNN is the best DNN host around!
Support Forum Minimize
Subject: Amazon S3 Bucket per portal
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Author Messages
Marc Huijbregts
Posts:38
Golden Member

07/28/2008 1:23 PM  

Hi Pengtsen,

I noticed when configuring Amazon S3 integration withing the configuration module for UVG that different portals are using the same Amazon bucket.

Is it possible to configure UVG withing different portals to use their own portal specific Amazon S3 bucket?

I hope the below mentioned example gives you a clear view of what I try to achieve.
Currently
Portal 0: Bucket 0
Portal 1: Bucket 0
Portal 2: Bucket 0

Desired
Portal 0: Bucket 0
Portal 1: Bucket 1
Portal 2: Bucket 2

Thanks in advance,


Regards,
Marc

www.biservices.eu for FREE nl-NL ResourcePacks (incl. UVG 2.4.4)
Pengtsen R
Posts:5241


07/28/2008 4:56 PM  
I'm sorry, they must be same bucket.

Pengtsen R
http://www.bizmodules.net
Marc Huijbregts
Posts:38
Golden Member

07/28/2008 11:25 PM  
Hi Pengtsen,

That is a shame. Could this be something to consider for a new release?

It will give one detailed info on which portal uses the bucket the most and therefore, is responsible for a larger part of the costs for using Amazon S3.

Regards,
Marc

www.biservices.eu for FREE nl-NL ResourcePacks (incl. UVG 2.4.4)
Pengtsen R
Posts:5241


07/29/2008 9:37 PM  
ok, I'll consider your suggestion if more peoples require it.

thank you.

Pengtsen R
http://www.bizmodules.net
Jack Hoelz
Posts:30
Golden Member

08/04/2008 10:47 PM  
So on a single installation all portals must use the same bucket? That should certainly be changed. Each instance of the module should be able to specify it's own bucket.
Pengtsen R
Posts:5241


08/05/2008 5:30 AM  
yes, currently all protals use same bucket. thank you for you suggestion.

Pengtsen R
http://www.bizmodules.net
rob ax
Posts:94
Diamond Member

08/19/2008 3:26 AM  
I haven't started using this feature but am planning to and it must work with multiple portals.

How does it affect the use of the module if each portal uses the same S3 bucket? Do the different portals see each other's files or is it just a technicality behind the scenes?

Regards,
Rbo
Pengtsen R
Posts:5241


08/19/2008 6:59 AM  
no, actually there is no noticeable difference to you, just a technical problem.

Pengtsen R
http://www.bizmodules.net
Marc Huijbregts
Posts:38
Golden Member

08/19/2008 8:14 AM  
Hi PengtsenR,

What happens when users from a different portal, but with the same username, start uploading videos?

I noticed that, within the bucket I use, the username is used for storing the videos. I know that the URL + filename will be stored within the database.

How if one has multiple portals within the same DNN installation which should use a different registration key from AWS because one doesn't want to give access to all of the buckets. This way a host needs to configure all the UVG configuration modules.


Regards,
Marc

www.biservices.eu for FREE nl-NL ResourcePacks (incl. UVG 2.4.4)
rob ax
Posts:94
Diamond Member

08/19/2008 3:54 PM  
hmm.. the way I was planning on it was to use my own single S3 account to provide the resources for all portals, and I think that will work fine because I personally manage and configure all modules everywhere.

But I think Marc has a point if the module is managed in different portals by different people. They would certainly have an issue with having to share another person's S3 account.. especially if there's no way to determine if one portal spends 90% of the resource and another only 10%.
Pengtsen R
Posts:5241


08/19/2008 6:23 PM  
I remember the s3 integration wizard is only available to host users, so normal users in other portals can't use it.

Pengtsen R
http://www.bizmodules.net
daniel comp
Posts:18
Silver Member

09/02/2008 5:13 PM  
I've had a look at my S3 folders and it seems that the 'user name' folder structure doesn't make much more than an asthetic mater. I see that individual files are given long names 'agu-fa556of-haofhi35-ad6fh-33ois-5dhdf.swf' so I can't imagine there being a cross-over with another file.

But I could be missing something.

Is the problem simply the ACCESS to the S3 folder structure via an application that requires the key?

If a vote is taken, I'd go for being able to assign the upload folders to each instance of the S3 uploader.
Pengtsen R
Posts:5241


09/02/2008 9:28 PM  
daniel, so you are suggesting to upload files to separated buckets for each portal too?

Pengtsen R
http://www.bizmodules.net
Marc Huijbregts
Posts:38
Golden Member

09/02/2008 11:26 PM  
Posted By Pengtsen R on 08/19/2008 6:23 PM
I remember the s3 integration wizard is only available to host users, so normal users in other portals can't use it.
This is very much true, but this also means that when a host user has set up a multi portal environment for other users (eg hosting company), they will have to determine the S3 account to be used. There doesn't seem to be a way to divide the cost over the portals which have uploaded & watched the videos (maybe I have missed this).

Also non hosting companies with multi portals would like to be able to determine which portal is the cost driver. For instance, to be able to diversify the charges for advertisements on a site (this will be mine option).

Therefore, I would it be great to have an option for multiple S3 accounts, which suits hosting companies, and the the ability to choose from different buckets will enable to detect which portal consumes the most.  The polluter pays!!


Regards,
Marc

www.biservices.eu for FREE nl-NL ResourcePacks (incl. UVG 2.4.4)
Pengtsen R
Posts:5241


09/03/2008 8:35 AM  
Marc, your opinion is to have separated s3 account for each portal, this post was talking about to have separated buckcts for each portals, so I would like to hear from more peoples to see which is going to be supported.

Pengtsen R
http://www.bizmodules.net
Marc Huijbregts
Posts:38
Golden Member

09/03/2008 10:01 AM  
Hi Pengtsen R,

You're right, I believe that this would the scenario which covers it all. However, I will settle for the seperate buckets for a S3 account.


Regards,
Marc

www.biservices.eu for FREE nl-NL ResourcePacks (incl. UVG 2.4.4)
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Forums > Ultra Video Gallery > Support Questions > Amazon S3 Bucket per portal

Enterprise level DotNetNuke Solutions Copyright © 2005-2008 BizModules   |  Contact Us  |  Terms Of Use  |  Privacy Statement